What norms contribute to this behavior?

Social norms are the perceived, informal rules that define acceptable, appropriate, and obligatory actions within a given group or community. Some social norms are specific to a particular context, while others may be broad enough to span multiple contexts; even seemingly contradictory norms may exist in the same context.1

The following examples represent social norms relevant to voluntary use of contraception for older adolescents and young adults (ages 15-25) that emerged from across the literature. They are not meant to be a comprehensive list of all relevant social norms or norms relevant in all contexts. 

  • Large families are desirable in many communities, meaning young couples may be reluctant to use contraception.2–13 Son preference norms within communities may impact family spacing and size, as couples try to achieve an ‘ideal’ family composition.14–17 Delayed marriage and therefore delayed childbearing can result in shorter birth intervals, indicating a desire to “catch up” to develop a large family size.18
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Protection; Social Status
  • Child spacing is viewed as acceptable in many religious communities, though not always through modern methods.5,7,8,13,19,20 Some communities have protective norms against having children too close together–for example, norms against getting pregnant while still breastfeeding.5,8,21 However, child spacing may also be seen as unacceptable in other religious communities.12
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Protection; Social Status
  • Norms associated with femininities, such as women must prove they can get pregnant, and that they prove womanhood through large families, are associated with deciding to use –or not use– contraception to space pregnancies.2–5,12,13,20,21
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Protection; Social Status
  • Norms that promote men as the head of the household discourage shared decision-making regarding the timing of births and family size and can lead husbands to impose control over contraception –either forcing or prohibiting its use.9,11,22–25
    Meta-Norms: Authority; Control and Violence; Gender Ideology; Social Status
  • Couples may feel pressure to conceive soon after they get married to allay concerns about infertility, leading to a delay in contraceptive uptake.12,26 Because of this pressure, contraceptive use and even discussion may be seen as appropriate only after a first child.6,13,20,21,27
    Meta-Norms: Control and Violence; Gender Ideology; Social Status
  • Child spacing is seen as improving quality of life and health of families in communities.2,5,6,8,12,19
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Protection; Social Status
  • Women are considered responsible for contraceptive use, including for child spacing,4,15,28 but often lack the agency or household decision-making power to practice it.2–6,8,13 Women may see it as common or acceptable to covertly use family planning methods to space pregnancies.5,29
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Privacy; Social Status
  • Norms associated with social hierarchies between medical providers and young couples, especially young women, may impact contraceptive use. Due to the power hierarchy inherent in the relationship, young women may not feel comfortable discussing sexual and reproductive health with their medical provider. 13,30–32
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Protection; Social Status
  • Seeking or discussing family planning may be considered taboo, creating barriers to contraceptive use, due to the perception that it promotes promiscuity and infidelity among women,4,21,24,28,29,33 that it is a private matter,13  or that communicating about contraception is inappropriate or taboo.7,24,30
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Protection; Social Status
  • Norms related to the uncleanness of menstrual blood may prohibit women from using contraception for fear of irregular bleeding as a side effect.21,29
    Meta-Norms: Gender Ideology; Protection; Social Status

Section Resources

  1. Social Norms Lexicon.; 2021. Accessed July 13, 2022. https://www.irh.org/resource-library/social-norms-lexicon/
  2. Dumbaugh M, Bapolisi W, Bisimwa G, Mwamini MC, Mommers P, Merten S. Navigating fertility, reproduction and modern contraception in the fragile context of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: ‘Les enfants sont une richesse.’ Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2019;21(3):323-337. doi:10.1080/13691058.2018.1470255
  3. Izugbara C, Ibisomi L, Ezeh AC, Mandara M. Gendered interests and poor spousal contraceptive communication in Islamic northern Nigeria. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2010;36(4):219-224. doi:10.1783/147118910793048494
  4. Kabagenyi A, Jennings L, Reid A, Nalwadda G, Ntozi J, Atuyambe L. Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services : a qualitative study of men and women ’ s perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda Research suggests that male involvement can increase uptake and continuation of f. Reproductive Health. 2014;11(21):1-9.
  5. Kane S, Kok M, Rial M, Matere A, Dieleman M, Broerse JEW. Social norms and family planning decisions in South Sudan. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1183. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3839-6
  6. Klingberg-Allvin M, Berggren V, Binh NT, Bijay B, Johansson A. Married men’s first time experiences of early childbearing and their role in sexual and reproductive decision making: a qualitative study from rural Vietnam. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(4):449-461.
  7. Akinwale DO, RPHN RM, Okafor AN, Akinbade OM, Ojo CI. Determinants of Modern Contraceptives Utilization among Women of Reproductive Age in Rural Community, Osun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2020;13(2):1173.
  8. Duclos D, Cavallaro FL, Ndoye T, et al. Critical insights on the demographic concept of “birth spacing”: locating Nef in family well-being, bodies, and relationships in Senegal. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters. 2019;27(1):136-145. doi:10.1080/26410397.2019.1581533
  9. Muanda MF, Ndongo GP, Messina LJ, Bertrand JT. Barriers to modern contraceptive use in rural areas in DRC. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2017;19(9):1011-1023. doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1286690
  10. Walcott MM, Ehiri J, Kempf MC, et al. Gender Norms and Family Planning Practices Among Men in Western Jamaica. American Journal of Men’s Health. 2014;9(4):307-316. doi:10.1177/1557988314543792
  11. Newmann SJ, Zakaras JM, Dworkin SL, et al. Measuring Men’s Gender Norm Beliefs Related to Contraception: Development of the Masculine Norms and Family Planning Acceptance Scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2021;50(6):2691-2702.
  12. Elmusharaf K, Byrne E, O’Donovan D. Social and traditional practices and their implications for family planning: a participatory ethnographic study in Renk, South Sudan. Reproductive Health. 2017;14(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0273-2
  13. Capurchande R, Coene G, Schockaert I, Macia M, Meulemans H. “It is challenging… oh, nobody likes it!”: A qualitative study exploring Mozambican adolescents and young adults’ experiences with contraception. BMC Women’s Health. 2016;16(1):1-17. doi:10.1186/s12905-016-0326-2
  14. Dynes M, Stephenson R, Rubardt M, Bartel D. The influence of perceptions of community norms on current contraceptive use among men and women in Ethiopia and Kenya. Health & Place. 2012;18(4):766-773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.006
  15. Onyango MA, Owoko S, Oguttu M. Factors that influence male involvement in sexual and reproductive health in western Kenya: a qualitative study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(4).
  16. Wasti SP, Simmons R, Limbu N, et al. Side-effects and social norms influencing family planning use in Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(59):222-229.
  17. Imtishal M, Mohammadnezhad M. Male partners and medical staff’s perception on contributing factors of Family  Planning (FP) in Fiji. Heliyon. 2021;7(1):e06068. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06068
  18. McGuire C, Stephenson R. Community factors influencing birth spacing among married women in Uganda and Zimbabwe. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2015;19(1):14-24.
  19. Adedini SA, Babalola S, Ibeawuchi C, Omotoso O, Akiode A, Odeku M. Role of Religious Leaders in Promoting Contraceptive Use in Nigeria: Evidence From the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative. Global Health: Science and Practice. 2018;6(3):500 LP – 514. doi:10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00135
  20. Paul M, Essén B, Sariola S, Iyengar S, Soni S, Klingberg Allvin M. Negotiating Collective and Individual Agency: A qualitative study of young women’s reproductive health in Rural India. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(3):311-324.
  21. Bornstein M, Huber-Krum S, Kaloga M, Norris A. Messages around contraceptive use and implications in rural Malawi. Culture, Health and Sexuality. 2021;23(8):1126-1141. doi:10.1080/13691058.2020.1764625
  22. Muanda M, Gahungu Ndongo P, Taub LD, Bertrand JT. Barriers to Modern Contraceptive Use in Kinshasa, DRC. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0167560.
  23. Schuler SR, Rottach E, Mukiri P. Gender norms and family planning decision-making in Tanzania: a qualitative study. Journal of Public Health in Africa. 2011;2(2).
  24. Bhatt N, Bhatt B, Neupane B, et al. Perceptions of family planning services and its key barriers among adolescents and young people in Eastern Nepal: A qualitative study. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0252184.
  25. Kenny L, Hassan R, Bacchus LJ, et al. Reproductive health decision making among nomadic pastoralists in North Eastern Kenya: a qualitative social network analysis. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):108. doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01164-1
  26. Sedlander E, Bingenheimer JB, Thiongo M, et al. “They destroy the reproductive system”: exploring the belief that modern contraceptive use causes infertility. Stud Fam Plann. 2018;49(4):345-365.
  27. Alvergne A, Gibson MA, Gurmu E, Mace R. Social Transmission and the Spread of Modern Contraception in Rural Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(7):e22515.
  28. Gipson JD, Muntifering CJ, Chauwa FK, Taulo F, Tsui AO, Hindin MJ. Assessing the Importance of Gender Roles in Couples’ Home- Based Sexual Health Services in Malawi. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(0):61-71.
  29. Hoyt J, Krishnaratne S, Hamon JK, et al. “As a woman who watches how my family is… I take the difficult decisions”: a qualitative study on integrated family planning and childhood immunisation services in five African countries. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):41. doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01091-1
  30. Ayanore MA, Pavlova M, Groot W. Unmet reproductive health needs among women in some West African countries: a systematic review of outcome measures and determinants. Reproductive Health. 2016;13(1):5. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0104-x
  31. Challa S, Manu A, Morhe E, et al. Multiple levels of social influence on adolescent sexual and reproductive health decision-making and behaviors in Ghana. Women and Health. 2018;58(4):434-450. doi:10.1080/03630242.2017.1306607
  32. Jain A, Ismail H, Tobey E, Erulkar A. Stigma as a barrier to family planning use among married youth in Ethiopia. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2019;51(4):505-519. doi:10.1017/S0021932018000305
  33. Bagheri R, Shuib R, Karupiah P, Farvid P, Khalajabadi-Farahani F. A qualitative examination of men’s participation in contraceptive use and its barriers in Tehran. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2021;53(6):868-886.

What other factors affect this behavior?

Family planning use among older adolescents, especially for delaying first birth and spacing births, depends on a number of factors. For example, these may include the following:

Individual

  • Nomadic pastoralist women vs semi-nomadic pastoralist women1

Interpersonal

  • Couple and Community Education2–5
  • Polygamy3,6–9
  • Couple and Community Socio-economic Status4,5,10
  • Migrant vs resident husbands11,12

Community

Section Resources

  1. Kenny L, Hassan R, Bacchus LJ, et al. Reproductive health decision making among nomadic pastoralists in North Eastern Kenya: a qualitative social network analysis. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):108. doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01164-1
  2. Dynes M, Stephenson R, Rubardt M, Bartel D. The influence of perceptions of community norms on current contraceptive use among men and women in Ethiopia and Kenya. Health & Place. 2012;18(4):766-773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.006
  3. Alvergne A, Gibson MA, Gurmu E, Mace R. Social Transmission and the Spread of Modern Contraception in Rural Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(7):e22515.
  4. Ayanore MA, Pavlova M, Groot W. Unmet reproductive health needs among women in some West African countries: a systematic review of outcome measures and determinants. Reproductive Health. 2016;13(1):5. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0104-x
  5. McGuire C, Stephenson R. Community factors influencing birth spacing among married women in Uganda and Zimbabwe. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2015;19(1):14-24.
  6. Izugbara C, Ibisomi L, Ezeh AC, Mandara M. Gendered interests and poor spousal contraceptive communication in Islamic northern Nigeria. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care. 2010;36(4):219-224. doi:10.1783/147118910793048494
  7. Bornstein M, Huber-Krum S, Kaloga M, Norris A. Messages around contraceptive use and implications in rural Malawi. Culture, Health and Sexuality. 2021;23(8):1126-1141. doi:10.1080/13691058.2020.1764625
  8. Onyango MA, Owoko S, Oguttu M. Factors that influence male involvement in sexual and reproductive health in western Kenya: a qualitative study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(4).
  9. Elmusharaf K, Byrne E, O’Donovan D. Social and traditional practices and their implications for family planning: a participatory ethnographic study in Renk, South Sudan. Reproductive Health. 2017;14(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0273-2
  10. Costenbader E, Zissette S, Martinez A, et al. Getting to intent: Are social norms influencing intentions to use modern contraception in the DRC? PLOS ONE. 2019;14(7):e0219617.
  11. Shattuck D, Wasti SP, Limbu N, Chipanta NS, Riley C. Men on the move and the wives left behind: the impact of migration on family planning in Nepal. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019;27(1):248-261.
  12. Wasti SP, Simmons R, Limbu N, et al. Side-effects and social norms influencing family planning use in Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(59):222-229.
  13. Adams M, Johnson H, Lundgren R. “Condoms are not a family planning method”: how efforts to prevent HIV have failed to comprehensively address adolescent sexual and reproductive health. In: Journal of the International AIDS Society. Vol 15. John Wiley & Sons LTD The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester PO19 8SQ, W …; 2012:191.
  14. Rimal RN, Sripad P, Speizer IS, Calhoun LM. Interpersonal communication as an agent of normative influence: a mixed method study among the urban poor in India. Reproductive Health. 2015;12(1):71. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0061-4
  15. Okigbo CC, Speizer IS, Domino ME, Curtis SL, Halpern CT, Fotso JC. Gender norms and modern contraceptive use in urban Nigeria: A multilevel longitudinal study. BMC Women’s Health. 2018;18(1):1-17. doi:10.1186/s12905-018-0664-3
  16. Klingberg-Allvin M, Berggren V, Binh NT, Bijay B, Johansson A. Married men’s first time experiences of early childbearing and their role in sexual and reproductive decision making: a qualitative study from rural Vietnam. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(4):449-461.
  17. Wegs C, Creanga AA, Galavotti C, Wamalwa E. Community Dialogue to Shift Social Norms and Enable Family Planning: An Evaluation of the Family Planning Results Initiative in Kenya. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0153907.
  18. Muanda MF, Ndongo GP, Messina LJ, Bertrand JT. Barriers to modern contraceptive use in rural areas in DRC. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2017;19(9):1011-1023. doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1286690
  19. Hewett PC, Austrian K, Soler-Hampejsek E, Behrman JR, Bozzani F, Jackson-Hachonda NA. Cluster randomized evaluation of Adolescent Girls Empowerment Programme (AGEP): study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1-12.

Who influences this behavior?

Certain groups or individuals influence young people to use family planning methods, including their partners, friends, and peers, as well as local and religious leaders. Families, especially parents and in-laws, are also important reference groups depending on the context.

Section Resources

  1. Bhushan N. Social Influence And Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent Girls And Young Women In Malawi. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2018.
  2. Costenbader E, Zissette S, Martinez A, et al. Getting to intent: Are social norms influencing intentions to use modern contraception in the DRC? PLOS ONE. 2019;14(7):e0219617.
  3. Dynes M, Stephenson R, Rubardt M, Bartel D. The influence of perceptions of community norms on current contraceptive use among men and women in Ethiopia and Kenya. Health & Place. 2012;18(4):766-773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.006
  4. Muanda M, Gahungu Ndongo P, Taub LD, Bertrand JT. Barriers to Modern Contraceptive Use in Kinshasa, DRC. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0167560.
  5. Thapa K, Dhital R, Rajbhandari S, et al. Factors affecting the behavior outcomes on post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device uptake and continuation in Nepal: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019;19(1):148. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2310-y
  6. Imtishal M, Mohammadnezhad M. Male partners and medical staff’s perception on contributing factors of Family  Planning (FP) in Fiji. Heliyon. 2021;7(1):e06068. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06068
  7. Kenny L, Hassan R, Bacchus LJ, et al. Reproductive health decision making among nomadic pastoralists in North Eastern Kenya: a qualitative social network analysis. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):108. doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01164-1
  8. Bornstein M, Huber-Krum S, Kaloga M, Norris A. Messages around contraceptive use and implications in rural Malawi. Culture, Health and Sexuality. 2021;23(8):1126-1141. doi:10.1080/13691058.2020.1764625
  9. Dumbaugh M, Bapolisi W, Bisimwa G, Mwamini MC, Mommers P, Merten S. Navigating fertility, reproduction and modern contraception in the fragile context of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: ‘Les enfants sont une richesse.’ Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2019;21(3):323-337. doi:10.1080/13691058.2018.1470255
  10. Challa S, Manu A, Morhe E, et al. Multiple levels of social influence on adolescent sexual and reproductive health decision-making and behaviors in Ghana. Women and Health. 2018;58(4):434-450. doi:10.1080/03630242.2017.1306607
  11. Jain A, Ismail H, Tobey E, Erulkar A. Stigma as a barrier to family planning use among married youth in Ethiopia. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2019;51(4):505-519. doi:10.1017/S0021932018000305
  12. Capurchande R, Coene G, Schockaert I, Macia M, Meulemans H. “It is challenging… oh, nobody likes it!”: A qualitative study exploring Mozambican adolescents and young adults’ experiences with contraception. BMC Women’s Health. 2016;16(1):1-17. doi:10.1186/s12905-016-0326-2
  13. Rimal RN, Sripad P, Speizer IS, Calhoun LM. Interpersonal communication as an agent of normative influence: a mixed method study among the urban poor in India. Reproductive Health. 2015;12(1):71. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0061-4
  14. Gipson JD, Muntifering CJ, Chauwa FK, Taulo F, Tsui AO, Hindin MJ. Assessing the Importance of Gender Roles in Couples’ Home- Based Sexual Health Services in Malawi. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010;14(0):61-71.
  15. Klingberg-Allvin M, Berggren V, Binh NT, Bijay B, Johansson A. Married men’s first time experiences of early childbearing and their role in sexual and reproductive decision making: a qualitative study from rural Vietnam. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(4):449-461.
  16. Dingeta T, Oljira L, Worku A, Berhane Y. Low contraceptive utilization among young married women is associated with perceived social norms and belief in contraceptive myths in rural Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0247484.
  17. Hoyt J, Krishnaratne S, Hamon JK, et al. “As a woman who watches how my family is… I take the difficult decisions”: a qualitative study on integrated family planning and childhood immunisation services in five African countries. Reproductive Health. 2021;18(1):41. doi:10.1186/s12978-021-01091-1
  18. Muanda MF, Ndongo GP, Messina LJ, Bertrand JT. Barriers to modern contraceptive use in rural areas in DRC. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2017;19(9):1011-1023. doi:10.1080/13691058.2017.1286690
  19. Sedlander E, Bingenheimer JB, Thiongo M, et al. “They destroy the reproductive system”: exploring the belief that modern contraceptive use causes infertility. Stud Fam Plann. 2018;49(4):345-365.
  20. Wasti SP, Simmons R, Limbu N, et al. Side-effects and social norms influencing family planning use in Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(59):222-229.
  21. Elmusharaf K, Byrne E, O’Donovan D. Social and traditional practices and their implications for family planning: a participatory ethnographic study in Renk, South Sudan. Reproductive Health. 2017;14(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0273-2
  22. Alvergne A, Gibson MA, Gurmu E, Mace R. Social Transmission and the Spread of Modern Contraception in Rural Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2011;6(7):e22515.
  23. Wegs C, Creanga AA, Galavotti C, Wamalwa E. Community Dialogue to Shift Social Norms and Enable Family Planning: An Evaluation of the Family Planning Results Initiative in Kenya. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0153907. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153907
  24. Paul M, Essén B, Sariola S, Iyengar S, Soni S, Klingberg Allvin M. Negotiating Collective and Individual Agency: A qualitative study of young women’s reproductive health in Rural India. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(3):311-324.

Selected interventions addressing norms and behaviors

  • Girl Power-Malawi (GPM) was implemented by UNC Project-Malawi from February 2016 to August 2017 across four health clinics in Lilongwe, Malawi. The project aimed to improve care-seeking and reduce sexual risk behaviors among adolescent girls and young women. Major intervention components included youth-friendly healthcare, empowerment sessions and cash transfers. Youth-friendly care consisted of health clinics with a separate space for integrated sexual and reproductive health care, provided by staff who had received training for confidential, non-judgmental care. 12 monthly, group-based, interactive empowerment sessions were offered by a trained counselor, addressing romantic relationships, financial concepts, and skills like problem-solving and communication. Finally, conditional cash transfers were provided to girls after attending each empowerment session. The intervention was evaluated through a multi-arm study to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention activities alone and in combination. Findings showed improvements in young women’s communication with others including their partners about contraception and family planning method use. Young women in the empowerment sessions had positive associations with using contraception, a relationship mediated by communicating about contraception.1,2
  • Masculinité, Famille, et Foi, part of the Passages Project, was implemented by Tearfund in Kinshasa, DRC, between 2015-2020. The program sought to reduce gender-based violence and increase family planning use among newly married couples and first-time parents through creating protective normative religious environments and working with religious leaders as agents of change. The intervention consisted of engaging faith leaders, building capacity of mentors (called Gender Champions), hosting community dialogues, conducting organized diffusion, and fostering an enabling service environment. Faith leaders and Gender Champions received gender transformative training before organizing and leading regular group discussions, including service linkages to local health clinics. Community mobilization included stories of change, and supportive sermons to the entire congregation. Researchers used factor analysis to measure how social norms influenced participant intentions to use modern family planning, which showed that women were concerned about social sanctions resulting from contraceptive use whereas men were influenced by perceptions of contraceptive use among their peers. An evaluation of the intervention using baseline and endline surveys found an increase in family planning acceptability for first-time parents including increased use, personal attitudes, self-efficacy, perceived social norms and couple communication around modern contraception. First-time parents also reported reduced experience and perpetration of violence to discourage modern contraception use.3,4

Section Resources

  1. Bhushan N. Social Influence And Contraceptive Use Among Adolescent Girls And Young Women In Malawi. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2018.
  2. Rosenberg NE, Bhushan NL, Vansia D, et al. Comparing youth friendly health services to the standard of care through “Girl Power-Malawi”: a Quasi-Experimental Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79(4):458.
  3. Costenbader E, Zissette S, Martinez A, et al. Getting to intent: Are social norms influencing intentions to use modern contraception in the DRC? PLOS ONE. 2019;14(7):e0219617.
  4. Institute for Reproductive Health. Masculinite, Famille et Foi: Promising Shifts in Norms to Support Family Planning in Faith Communities.; 2021.